NapkinCalc

Proofs & Logic — How We Know

Implication, converse & contrapositive

continues from lesson 1 — values defined earlier in the course stay live here

ELI5: "if P then Q" is the shape of every theorem. Two cousins to keep straight:

  • the contrapositive "if not Q then not P" is always equivalent — same truth.
  • the converse "if Q then P" is a different claim and often false.

Example: "if n is divisible by 4, then by 2" is true; its converse "divisible by 2 ⇒ divisible by 4" is false — 6 breaks it.

✓ pass mod(12,4)==0andmod(12,2)==0mod(12, 4) == 0 and mod(12, 2) == 0 the implication: 12 ÷ 4 ⇒ 12 ÷ 2
✓ pass mod(6,2)==0andmod(6,4)>0mod(6, 2) == 0 and mod(6, 4) > 0 the converse fails: 6 is divisible by 2 but NOT by 4

Real-world hook: mixing up a statement with its converse is the most common reasoning bug there is — "all fraud looks unusual" does not mean "all unusual activity is fraud."